{"id":3316,"date":"2008-11-24T06:00:06","date_gmt":"2008-11-24T06:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/136"},"modified":"2008-11-24T06:00:06","modified_gmt":"2008-11-24T06:00:06","slug":"the-orchid-thief-by-susan-orlean","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/the-orchid-thief-by-susan-orlean\/","title":{"rendered":"The Orchid Thief, by Susan Orlean"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The standard take on creative nonfiction, as promulgated by Lee Gutkind, et al., is that it is a factual narrative (that&#039;s the nonfiction part) told using creative writing techniques, a narrative that provides information about a subject while telling a story.  This book provides lots of information about Florida&#039;s history, Florida&#039;s quirky inhabitants, the history of orchid collecting, and some of orchid experts.  Where it falls down is that there is no story at the core of the book.<\/p>\n<p>It starts out as a sketch of John Larouche, an odd character who goes from one obsession to another, a narcissist who in his orchid period persuaded two Seminole Native Americans to help him steal wild orchids from Fakahatchee Swamp.  They were caught and, despite Larouche&#039;s argument that the Seminoles (and their employee) were exempt from laws protecting endangered species and public land, prosecuted. <\/p>\n<p>The only other discernable narrative is the author&#039;s desire to see a particular species, a ghost orchid.  She wades through swamps and talks to collectors and merchants alike, but always seems to arrive just before or just after her elusive prey has bloomed.<\/p>\n<p>Neither story line is enough to sustain the book.  There are too many tangents, chapters full of well-researched information that do not move either story forward.  I admit that none of these subjects particularly interests me, but good writers are always able to jump start my curiosity.  I just read\u2014fascinated\u2014a ten-page article about the recent history of Cyprus in the <em>London Review of Books<\/em> simply because Perry Anderson&#039;s prose sucked me in and wouldn&#039;t let me go.<\/p>\n<p>That didn&#039;t happen here.<\/p>\n<p>The book&#039;s flap promised that it would help me understand the passion that motivates people to collect things:  orchids, whatever.  I&#039;d hoped this was true.  I don&#039;t get collecting.   I just don&#039;t get it.  Sure, I&#039;m as materialistic as the next person and there are sometimes things that I just have to have, whether it&#039;s a particular blue and green scarf or a book about Arts and Crafts gardens.  But I don&#039;t have to have every kind of scarf in the world or every garden book.  Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with that; it&#039;s just not something that I can imagine wanting.<\/p>\n<p>My mother left me an assortment of her tchotchkes.  I confess I don&#039;t know what to do with them.  I can&#039;t just give them to the Salvation Army because they are \u201cfamily\u201d pieces:  a teacup made from clay from the family farm, crystal salt dishes handed down from my great-grandmother.  I don&#039;t want to dust them for the rest of my life, and certainly my kids aren&#039;t interested in them.  But I can&#039;t bring myself to toss them.  Someone, generations from now perhaps, may want to touch and hold something of their history.  At the same time, they&#039;re just stuff.  And stuff has always weighed me down.  I like emptiness, empty space around me.  I&#039;d hoped this book would take me briefly into the mind and heart of someone who wants one of every kind of something, a collector, someone obsessive about things.  <\/p>\n<p>That didn&#039;t happen either.<\/p>\n<p>The book seems to me like a character study, an essay (the author alludes to an earlier article she wrote on the subject) that someone thought could be expanded into a book.  It&#039;s well-written.  Orlean does a good job of presenting information in a palatable form, and her transitions between sections are very well done.  But  without a story, the book is hollow at the center.  I found it boring.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The standard take on creative nonfiction, as promulgated by Lee Gutkind, et al., is that it is a factual narrative (that&#039;s the nonfiction part) told using creative writing techniques, a narrative that provides information about a subject while telling a story. This book provides lots of information about Florida&#039;s history, Florida&#039;s quirky inhabitants, the history [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3316","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3316","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3316"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3316\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3316"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3316"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/eatmytoronto.com\/bmorrison\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3316"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}